PRJEB38061

BioProject first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

84/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Salmo salar

Instrument

DNBSEQ-G400

Platform

DNBSEQ

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

489 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 14022130163310 reported

total reads 63799504798 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 95 measured

pct q30 bases 90.3 measured

gc content pct 44.4 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 37.9 measured

adapter content pct 9.59 measured

duplication rate pct 12.28 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 84/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.3 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 12.28 measured ×0.5 87%

adapter content pct 9.59 measured ×0.4 39%

QC cost 31 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0