← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
2 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
632571356
reported
total reads
127914
reported
mean coverage
137.5
extrapolated
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
98.5
measured
pct q30 bases
97.7
measured
gc content pct
48.4
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
37.7
measured
adapter content pct
12.16
measured
duplication rate pct
1.17
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 90/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
137.5
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
97.7
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
1.17
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
12.16
measured
×0.4
20%
QC cost
2 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0