Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
60/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog) amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 24.9 million reads and 12.4 billion bases at good quality (92.3% Q20, 88.1% Q30). The 49.5% GC and 18 files suggest targeted profiling of microbiota or developmental samples. This amphibian dataset suits studying metamorphosis-associated microbiome changes or immune development in this classic vertebrate model.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0