← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Gallus gallus
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
273 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
14031440608143
reported
total reads
47670939551
reported
mean coverage
12755.9
extrapolated
n content pct
0.009
measured
pct q20 bases
92.9
measured
pct q30 bases
83.6
measured
gc content pct
42
measured
mean read length
149.4
measured
mean base quality
35.9
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
14.15
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 87/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
12755.9
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
83.6
measured
×1
68%
duplication rate pct
14.15
measured
×0.5
81%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
25 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0