Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
62/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 whole-genome sequencing dataset from Homo sapiens comprises 675 million reads and 44.6 billion bases at 14.4× mean coverage with reported 100% Q20 and 99.8% Q30 metrics, providing deep short-read coverage for variant discovery. The perfect Q20 metric is extraordinary and requires independent verification; if accurate, the dataset represents exceptional library quality. Researchers can leverage this for population genetics and disease-association studies, assuming quality claims withstand validation.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0