Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
32/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 hybrid short- and long-read whole-genome sequencing dataset from Brassica napus comprises 231 million reads and 209 billion bases; however, the anomalous 13.1% Q20 and 0% Q30 metrics indicate possible data-quality issues requiring verification. The 37.7% GC is reasonable for plant genomes; if quality is validated, the hybrid approach supports complete genome assembly of this economically important polyploid crop. Researchers must independently verify raw quality before assembly or variant-analysis applications.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0