PRJEB39685

BioProject first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

92/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Metagenomic WGS from feces achieves A-grade QC (92/100) with excellent base quality (Q30=95.6%) and minimal N-content. Duplication rate of 17.65% scored 70/100 (weight 0.5)—moderate but acceptable for metagenomic analysis, though may slightly compress rare-taxon detection. Strong evidence from NovaSeq 6000; suitable for comprehensive taxonomic and functional profiling.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

feces metagenome

Instrument

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

132 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1692354850909 reported

total reads 5799759561 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98.7 measured

pct q30 bases 95.6 measured

gc content pct 42.4 measured

mean read length 144.3 measured

mean base quality 36.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 17.65 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 92/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.6 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 17.65 measured ×0.5 70%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 35 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0