PRJEB40256

BioProject first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

98/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

human metagenome

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 3000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

130 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 98788519747 reported

total reads 662884594 reported

n content pct 0.009 measured

pct q20 bases 98.2 measured

pct q30 bases 94.9 measured

gc content pct 44.2 measured

mean read length 149.1 measured

mean base quality 39.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 10.74 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 98/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 10.74 measured ×0.5 91%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0