Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 4000 whole-exome sequencing dataset from Homo sapiens uses targeted capture to profile 910 million reads and 64 billion bases with excellent quality (98% Q20, 92.5% Q30), enabling high-sensitivity variant calling across coding regions. The elevated 59.9% GC (above typical exome ~50%) suggests either GC-rich targets or capture-kit bias; researchers should verify capture method and any GC-correction applied. The dataset is suitable for disease-gene discovery and clinical-exome interpretation.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0