Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens amplicon sequencing via 454 GS FLX with 185,239 reads and 101.6 million bases at lower quality (88.7% Q20, 66.6% Q30), read type unknown (low confidence). The 51.7% GC and elevated N-content (0.029%) reflect 454 limitations. This small, older-platform dataset is suitable only for exploratory human microbiota or targeted genetic studies and should be treated as preliminary without validation resequencing.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0