Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This NextSeq 500 whole-genome sequencing dataset from dietary supplements metagenome provides 814 million reads and 61.1 billion bases with high quality (94.8% Q20, 92.7% Q30), enabling species-level community profiling of microbial and fungal contaminants. The 40.8% GC spans typical environmental-microbe ranges; the depth supports detecting pathogenic organisms at rare frequencies. This dataset is valuable for dietary supplement safety assessment and regulatory-compliance screening.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0