Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 whole-genome sequencing dataset from Staphylococcus aureus provides 960 million reads and 148 billion bases with good quality (90.3% Q20, 81.6% Q30), supporting deep strain characterization and virulence-factor mapping in this multidrug-resistant pathogen. The low 35.2% GC content warrants verification; the large scale enables detecting prophage insertions, plasmids, and antibiotic-resistance determinants for outbreak investigation and antimicrobial-stewardship applications.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0