Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This BGISEQ-500 amplicon dataset from an unspecified metagenome comprises 2.5 billion reads and 380 billion bases with high quality (97% Q20, 92.1% Q30), representing massive-scale targeted amplicon profiling via this alternative sequencing platform. The 43% GC and scale support rare-taxon discovery and strain-level community resolution. Researchers should confirm the amplicon target and verify platform-specific processing for compatibility with standard bioinformatic pipelines.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0