Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq amplicon dataset from Mus musculus contains 3.1 million reads with high quality (93.6% Q20, 89.5% Q30), suitable for targeted marker-gene surveys in mouse tissues or microbiota samples. The 54.3% GC and read-level fidelity support sensitive detection of amplified targets across multiple individuals or conditions. Researchers should verify the amplicon design and expected product length to ensure compatibility with MiSeq chemistry constraints and confirm biological context (tissue, developmental stage) for appropriate interpretation.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0