PRJEB44879

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

methylation

Organism

Populus nigra var. italica

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

420 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5306178125400.001 reported

total reads 35374520836 reported

n content pct 0.006 measured

pct q20 bases 97.8 measured

pct q30 bases 94.9 measured

gc content pct 20.2 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 39 measured

adapter content pct 6.86 measured

duplication rate pct 13.54 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.9 measured ×1 100%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0