Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 3000 whole-genome sequencing dataset from human gut metagenome samples provides 9.2 billion reads and 1.37 trillion bases with high quality (97.8% Q20, 94% Q30) and minimal sequencing error (0.007% N-content), enabling comprehensive microbial community assembly and strain-level discrimination. The massive scale supports recovering complete or near-complete genomes for abundant community members and detecting organisms below 16S amplicon sensitivity. Researchers can leverage this for metabolic reconstruction and understanding within-sample functional diversity.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0