Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
62/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This HiSeq X Ten whole-genome sequencing dataset from Homo sapiens comprises 419 million reads and 25.7 billion bases at 8.3× mean coverage with exceptional quality (99.9% Q20, 99.6% Q30), providing high-fidelity short-read coverage for rare-variant and structural-variant detection. The near-perfect quality metrics are consistent with modern Illumina workflows; the coverage supports population-scale variant surveys and genome-wide association studies. Researchers can confidently apply this for de novo mutation discovery and variant-calling algorithm validation.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0