Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2000 whole-genome sequencing dataset from Escherichia coli 536 comprises 121 million reads and 23.8 billion bases with high quality (94.6% Q20, 86.5% Q30), enabling confident variant calling and comparative analysis in this uropathogenic clinical isolate. The 51.7% GC is characteristic for E. coli; the depth supports detecting single-nucleotide variants, small indels, and copy-number variation. This dataset is well-suited for studying pathogenicity determinants and antimicrobial-resistance genotypes in clinical contexts.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0