Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 7.3 million reads and 2.2 billion bases at good quality (95.7% Q20, 89.7% Q30). The 53% GC and 96 files indicate multi-sample community or targeted profiling. Users should verify the amplicon marker and verify whether this modest read depth per sample is suitable for the statistical power needed for your differential-abundance or diversity analyses.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0