← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
12 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
85884425900
reported
total reads
613460185
reported
n content pct
0.076
measured
pct q20 bases
74.9
measured
pct q30 bases
66.4
measured
gc content pct
44.7
measured
mean read length
70
measured
mean base quality
27.8
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
1.46
measured
mean target coverage
1385.2
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean target coverage
1385.2
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
66.4
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
1.46
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
29 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0