Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2000 whole-genome sequencing dataset from Phascolarctos cinereus (koala) provides 2.04 billion reads and 412 billion bases with good quality (96.5% Q20, 90.6% Q30), supporting comprehensive resequencing of this endangered marsupial. The 39% GC is typical for mammals; the depth enables population-level variant discovery and phylogenetic analysis for conservation management. Researchers studying marsupial genomics or disease susceptibility can leverage this for marker development and breeding-program design.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0