← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 5 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
5 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
65/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Solanum arcanum
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
84 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2784059068100
reported
total reads
13922001873
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
94.3
measured
pct q30 bases
86.7
measured
gc content pct
45.5
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
34
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
67.8
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 65/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
86.7
measured
×1
84%
duplication rate pct
67.8
measured
×0.5
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0