Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJEB58030

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

90/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Sus scrofa
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
2,980 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 13520084713860 reported
total reads 89536984860 reported
mean coverage 5408 extrapolated
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 97.8 measured
pct q30 bases 93.7 measured
gc content pct 43.2 measured
mean read length 151 measured
mean base quality 35.9 measured
adapter content pct 11.68 measured
duplication rate pct 5.49 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 90/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 5408 extrapolated ×1.2 100%
pct q30 bases 93.7 measured ×1 100%
duplication rate pct 5.49 measured ×0.5 100%
adapter content pct 11.68 measured ×0.4 24%
QC cost 9 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it