Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oxford Nanopore long-read WGS of Candida albicans via GridION produces 10.5 billion bases across ~2.8 million very long reads (mean ~3.7 kb), with 59.5% Q20 bases—typical nanopore accuracy. This dataset enables de novo assembly and structural variant discovery at a genomic scale in this medically important fungal pathogen, though base-level SNP confidence requires consensus correction or supplementary short-read polishing.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0