Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
76/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx short-read RNA-seq of Mus musculus produces 35.2 billion bases across 204 million reads at 87.5% Q20 and 81.1% Q30. Older-generation platform quality is moderate; data adequate for gene expression surveys though Q-score degradation increases false-positive SNP calls if SNP discovery is intended.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0