← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 10 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
10 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Ovis aries
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
236 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1237985586946
reported
total reads
4099290023
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
96.7
measured
pct q30 bases
89.3
measured
gc content pct
45.6
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
34.8
measured
adapter content pct
13.95
measured
duplication rate pct
17.7
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 87/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
89.3
measured
×1
97%
mean base quality
34.8
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
13.95
measured
×0.4
34%
duplication rate pct
17.7
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
17 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0