← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 12 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
12 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Oryza sativa
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
25,529 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
17014379105857
reported
total reads
102492705034
reported
mean coverage
39568.3
extrapolated
n content pct
0.003
measured
pct q20 bases
97.8
measured
pct q30 bases
93
measured
gc content pct
43.5
measured
mean read length
83
measured
mean base quality
36.8
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
2.45
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
39568.3
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
93
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
2.45
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
9 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0