← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
marine metagenome
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
2,269 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
987924221993
reported
total reads
3804579203
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
92.5
measured
pct q30 bases
87
measured
gc content pct
41.6
measured
mean read length
251
measured
mean base quality
36
measured
adapter content pct
0.14
measured
duplication rate pct
94.29
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 90/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
87
measured
×1
85%
adapter content pct
0.14
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
20 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0