Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq whole-genome sequencing dataset from Aeromonas australiensis provides 2.1 million reads and 839 million bases with moderate quality (78.7% Q20, 64.5% Q30), supporting draft genome assembly of this freshwater bacterium. The 57.5% GC is typical for the genus; the shallow depth limits structural-variant resolution and repetitive-region assembly. Researchers pursuing finished genomes should consider supplementary long-read sequencing or reference-guided approaches to resolve mobile genetic elements and plasmids.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0