Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
85/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq whole-genome sequencing dataset from Aeromonas caviae delivers 1.3 million reads and 542 million bases with good quality (92.2% Q20, 84.2% Q30), supporting draft genome assembly of this freshwater pathogen. The elevated 61.2% GC content is unusual for Aeromonas and warrants verification against reference genomes (possible contamination or atypical strain). Moderate depth suggests single-pass sequencing; researchers needing finished assemblies should pursue long-read or additional short-read coverage.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0