Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
56/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq whole-genome sequencing dataset from Aeromonas encheleia provides 1.5 million reads and 657 million bases with good quality (84.8% Q20, 73.4% Q30), suitable for draft genome assembly. The elevated 61.9% GC is unusual for Aeromonas and suggests strain variation or sequencing artifact; the moderate depth limits structural-variant detection. Researchers pursuing comparative Aeromonas genomics should pair this with reference-guided approaches or supplementary sequencing for improved assembly contiguity and accuracy.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0