Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq whole-genome sequencing dataset from Aeromonas fluvialis provides 728,000 reads and 212 million bases with high quality (95.5% Q20, 90.5% Q30), supporting draft genome assembly of this freshwater bacterium. The 58% GC is consistent with Aeromonas; the shallow depth limits resolution of large structural variants and mobile genetic elements. Researchers pursuing complete genomes or pan-genome analysis should consider combining with reference-guided assembly or additional sequencing for improved contiguity.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0