Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq whole-genome sequencing dataset from Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida (fish pathogen) delivers 1.3 million reads and 761 million bases with good quality (91.1% Q20, 80.3% Q30), supporting draft genome assembly and isolate typing. The 57.2% GC is characteristic; the shallow depth suggests focus on coding-region variant detection and plasmid recovery. Researchers in aquaculture pathogen surveillance should pair this with reference-guided assembly or supplementary sequencing for improved completeness.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0