PRJEB7044

BioProject first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Aeromonas WGS. High reusability despite grade A- (96/100). Duplication at 12.54% is the sole limiting factor and reflects PCR enrichment during library prep, but Q30 (90.3%) and zero adapters make it suitable for most genomic workflows.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Aeromonas veronii bv. veronii

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 309373738 reported

total reads 1145308 reported

n content pct 0.168 measured

pct q20 bases 95.2 measured

pct q30 bases 90.3 measured

gc content pct 57.9 measured

mean read length 134.9 measured

mean base quality 35.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 12.54 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.3 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 12.54 measured ×0.5 86%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 22 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0