Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This 454 GS FLX Titanium whole-genome sequencing dataset from Pyricularia grisea comprises 26.8 million reads and 2.7 billion bases with moderate quality (85.5% Q20, 60.6% Q30). The platform's longer reads benefit assembly of repetitive fungal genomes (47.7% GC); however, older-platform error rates and limited depth constrain accuracy. Researchers pursuing comparative genomics or pathogenicity studies should supplement with modern short- or long-read sequencing for improved structural-variant confidence.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0