← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 6 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
6 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
28/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 1000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
1,252 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
982557615624
reported
total reads
4864146612
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
85.9
measured
pct q30 bases
70.5
measured
gc content pct
50.4
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
29.9
measured
adapter content pct
17.16
measured
duplication rate pct
1.01
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 28/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
70.5
measured
×1
3%
duplication rate pct
1.01
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
17.16
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
12 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0