Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
44/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq amplicon dataset from Heriades truncorum provides 11.6 million reads and 5.8 billion bases with good quality (78.6% Q20, 73.3% Q30), supporting targeted genetic diversity assessment or microbiota profiling in this cavity-nesting bee. The 52.7% GC is consistent with typical marker-gene signatures; the moderate depth enables population-level inference. Reusers should identify the specific amplicon target (rRNA, mitochondrial gene, or fungal marker) and confirm sample-barcode compatibility with their analysis pipeline before ecological or population-genetic interpretation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0