← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
29/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
MinION
Platform
OXFORD_NANOPORE
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
8 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
29736202
reported
total reads
2459
reported
mean coverage
6.5
extrapolated
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
9.2
measured
pct q30 bases
4.5
measured
gc content pct
47.4
measured
mean read length
5695.4
measured
mean base quality
8.3
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
0
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 29/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
6.5
extrapolated
×1.2
0%
pct q30 bases
4.5
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
2 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0