Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq amplicon dataset from mouse gut metagenome comprises 9.4 million reads with high quality (95.5% Q20, 93.7% Q30), providing robust profiling of microbial alpha and beta diversity in this well-studied model system. The 54.4% GC and consistent metrics are consistent with standard marker-gene amplicon protocols; the depth detects rare operational taxonomic units and developmental or treatment-induced shifts in community composition. Reuse for mouse microbiota-related phenotypes requires alignment of sample metadata (age, diet, genotype, perturbation).
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0