PRJEB9815

BioProject first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

32/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Bacteria aborigena

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

120 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 6250597681 reported

total reads 12453526 reported

n content pct 0.118 measured

pct q20 bases 85.3 measured

pct q30 bases 78.3 measured

gc content pct 54.1 measured

mean read length 251 measured

mean base quality 32.6 measured

adapter content pct 13.17 measured

duplication rate pct 75.87 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 32/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 78.3 measured ×1 42%

adapter content pct 13.17 measured ×0.5 13%

QC cost 8 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0