Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA1044268

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

93/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Honeybee (Apis mellifera) WGS on NovaSeq 6000 with 4.96 billion 150 bp reads achieving perfect 100% Q20 and Q30 across 1.49 Tb represents exceptional sequencing quality and massive coverage. The 32.7% GC is consistent with the smaller bee genome; ultra-high depth enables de novo assembly, structural variant discovery, and exhaustive SNP cataloging for bee genomics and population studies.

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Apis mellifera
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
151 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 1486512579900 reported
total reads 4955041933 reported
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 100 measured
pct q30 bases 100 measured
gc content pct 32.7 measured
mean read length 150 measured
mean base quality 30 measured
adapter content pct 0.08 measured
duplication rate pct 16.56 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 93/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 100 measured ×1 100%
duplication rate pct 16.56 measured ×0.5 73%
adapter content pct 0.08 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 55