Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA1117782

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

89/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Metagenome WGS on HiSeq 4000 with 191.2 million 151 bp reads at 96.7% Q20 and 92% Q30 across 57.7 Gb provides substantial depth for microbial community profiling. The 41.1% GC is typical of diverse soil or environmental microbiomes; enables taxonomic binning, metabolic reconstruction, and functional annotation of unculturable organisms.

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 57737365056 reported
total reads 191183328 reported
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 96.7 measured
pct q30 bases 92 measured
gc content pct 41.1 measured
mean read length 151 measured
mean base quality 35.6 measured
adapter content pct 1.96 measured
duplication rate pct 20.08 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 89/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92 measured ×1 100%
duplication rate pct 20.08 measured ×0.5 62%
adapter content pct 1.96 measured ×0.4 93%
QC cost 13 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it