PRJNA1119040
BioProjectProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Environmental metagenome WGS on HiSeq 4000 with 199.9 million 151 bp reads at 94.7% Q20 and 88.2% Q30 across 52.9 Gb provides good coverage for microbial profiling. The extremely high 66.3% GC suggests enrichment of thermophiles, high-GC Actinobacteria, or specialized metabolic communities; suitable for functional genomics in specialized ecosystems.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.