Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA1200786

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

91/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Human bulk-RNA-seq on HiSeq 4000 with 9.14 billion 91 bp reads (1.30 Tb) at 94.9% Q20 and 90% Q30 provides exceptional depth and scale for transcriptome analysis. The 52.2% GC and reasonable quality enable comprehensive detection of rare isoforms, allele-specific expression, and splice-junction patterns across complex tissues.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
75 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 1299464580977 reported
total reads 9144156857 reported
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 94.9 measured
pct q30 bases 90 measured
gc content pct 52.2 measured
mean read length 91 measured
mean base quality 35.1 measured
adapter content pct 0.07 measured
duplication rate pct 55.43 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 91/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 35.1 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.07 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 55.43 measured ×0.4 44%
QC cost 10 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 88