PRJNA1215974
BioProjectProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Long-read MinION WGS of insect metagenome with 1.29 million reads averaging 2121 bp accumulated 2.88 Gb at 70.5% Q20 and 49.4% Q30, reflecting lower Nanopore accuracy. The 37.5% GC is consistent with insect genomes; ultra-long reads enable full-length contig assembly and structural variant detection despite high substitution error rates.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.