Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Gallus gallus bulk RNA-seq (Genome Analyzer IIx); grade B—usable but with caveats. Mean base quality of 30 (scored 33/100) is the limiting factor despite Q20 and Q30 appearing perfect, and elevated N-content (0.682%) suggests sequencing artifacts; Q30 of 100% provides a foundation, but aggressive quality filtering is recommended before transcript quantification.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0