Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
73/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Rice bulk RNA-seq. Marginal reusability (grade C); two competing defects: mean base quality of 30 (scored 33/100) and extreme duplication at 51.61% (scored 52/100), suggesting PCR artifacts or read-complexity collapse. Q30 perfection (100%) is undermined by the low base quality floor and duplication load.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0