← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Capsicum annuum
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
6 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
19059751720
reported
total reads
138088388
reported
n content pct
0.712
measured
pct q20 bases
72.1
measured
pct q30 bases
65.1
measured
gc content pct
41.4
measured
mean read length
85
measured
mean base quality
24.4
measured
adapter content pct
0.22
measured
duplication rate pct
3.71
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
65.1
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
24.4
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0.22
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
3.71
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
30 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0