Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This 454 GS FLX Titanium amplicon dataset from viral samples comprises 1.5 million reads and 832 million bases with moderate quality (89.4% Q20, 69% Q30), suitable for targeted viral community profiling via marker-gene amplification. The 53.5% GC and platform's longer reads aid in resolving hypervariable regions and avoiding primer-related artifacts. Reusers should confirm the specific viral target and primer sequences to assess suitability for their pathogen-surveillance or metagenomics questions.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0