Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
64/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Ovis aries hybrid WGS with poor measured quality (D grade). Q30 at 77.8% is below acceptable thresholds for SNP/indel discovery, likely driven by the 454 component (mean length 342.9 bp). Duplication is moderate (12.39%), but Q30 shortfall undermines variant sensitivity. Recommend selective reuse for assembly only, or resequencing.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0